[gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:18:58 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "GMPI list" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:12:30AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > Speaking of which, I still dont like r15:
> >
> > "GMPI must provide a way for the host to indicate the current 'quality
> > level' (1-10 or 1-100) to plugins. Plugins can use the quality level to
> > scale back resource requirements during realtime use. Hosts should
always
> > render at full quality."
> >
> > I vote to remove it.
>
> Why? Have you never been in a spot where you want to use a plugin, but
you
> don't have enough realtime power to run it full-tilt?
today it does not make really sens...
people don't buy a system to use it in low quality mode.
VB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin