[gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: "Koen Tanghe" <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:41:24 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> It's silly to have to remember to change
> the quality level to 100% when I go to render a track, that should be
> automagic.
It IS silly indeed... I tend to agree with that.
> So, as proposed it is a feature of the API that if you don't need in your
> plugins, then don't implement it. If other people want it in their
plugins,
> the host will be able to recognize it and treat it commonly.
That sounds fair, yes.
Koen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin