[gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: "Michael Gogins" <gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:01:37 -0500
I second the motion.
============================================
Michael Gogins
gogins at pipeline period com
Irreducible Productions
CsoundVST, an extended version of Csound for programming music and sound
Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/csound/
============================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "GMPI list" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:12 AM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:16:42 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php#r15 will take you
> > straight to requirement #15.
>
> Speaking of which, I still dont like r15:
>
> "GMPI must provide a way for the host to indicate the current 'quality
> level' (1-10 or 1-100) to plugins. Plugins can use the quality level to
> scale back resource requirements during realtime use. Hosts should always
> render at full quality."
>
> I vote to remove it.
>
> r16: will the host provide a threading mechanism to allow async work to
> take place (eg. FFT processing), or does this come under cross-platform.
>
> - Steve
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- » [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- [gmpi] Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Steve Harris