[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:06:28 +0000

On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 02:59:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> 2) Any changes needed to the "sample-rate at instantiation" req?  It was
> argued for a bit, then silence.

I dont think we reached consensus. I'm not sure wether that was just a
difference in nomenclature, or opinion.

- Steve 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:

[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
From: Tim Hockin

References:
- [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
  - From: Tim Hockin

[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11

Other related posts: