[geocentrism] geocentrism.
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:42:58 +1000
It seems that geocentrism cannot be opposed from any scientific point of view,
without dependence upon presumptions.
Likewise we cannot prove it from any scientific (accepted) point of view
without dependence upon presumptions.
If it wasn't for the word of God, I guess I gotta call the subject as haveing
come to a stalemate.
Philip.
- References:
- [geocentrism] Three days and three nights
- From: Dr. Neville Jones
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Carl Felland
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] Re: geocentrism
- » [geocentrism] geocentrism.
- [geocentrism] Three days and three nights
- From: Dr. Neville Jones
- [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Carl Felland