[geocentrism] Re: geocentrism

  • From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:49:02 +0000


Dear Philip,
To some degree I think you are correct however I would liken the geocentrist's position tp that of a creationist's. Since we cannot 'prove' the existence of God in a way that MS would accept; because it is of the metaphysical, we can however use science to falsify MS's materialist attempts to explain our existence and origins. This aapplies to all areas of science.

Jack

philip madsen wrote:
Geocentrism as a science. I know you all have noted my often presented defense of main stream science, not that I want to debunk geocentrism, but to be just plain fair. Perhaps it needs to be said outright... I have just spent several minutes looking at the side by side animations (GWW.) of the daily orbits of the solar system from both the geocentric and heliocentric perspective. It cannot be denied when considering all the natural motions of the planets around the central sun, as shown in both systems, that to claim an unmoving and central earth is very very unique, and goes against the natural order presented by the rest of the cosmos. Indeed against our own experimental evidence in earth bound laboratories. Its unfair to say otherwise.. Its going to require unique science to prove our claim, which we base solely on a supernatural/theological position. Philip.

Other related posts: