[geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 08:59:24 +1000

Phil..if there is a change from 30 gms to 0 grms (as detected on our 
scale).....then we have a change. that change is due to going from 0 velocity 
to some other velocity,  Allen

Not so!  And that is where you try to force your false imagination upon us.. 

The change to weightlessness occurs AT zero velocity, at the exact same moment 
of separation.. before the fall commences..  

Like the hovering of the thrown up ball..  At the peak of the curve when 
velocity is zero, weightlessness occurs. 

Do you deny this momentary stationary weightlessness. 

umpteenth chance Phil.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Allen Daves 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:03 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment


  philip said:  thanks to Paul he did the work for me and showed how Allen 
sidesteps logic to keep an impossible conversation going.......Yes Thanks Paul 
I think your postion and what you base your arguments on is quite clear to 
everyone now...:-) 
  Actualy Phil, Paul stated "Second, I'm not really interested in logic " so im 
not sure how he showed me to sidestep logic, he is not even interested in using 
it........LOL

  Notice the accusation of us being stupid..NO, I accused you then as well as 
now of ignoring evaluations of observations within logic secondly preferring 
imaginations external of facts or observations with a almost zealot like 
stubbornness to "keep the faith" regardless of what contradictions and 
inconsistencies it produces.... thirdly that you invoke your conclusions as the 
bases for all your evaluations that are supposed to demonstrate your 
conclusions.......that is called a circular fallacy but then again who cares 
about logic we are only here for "scientific discussion" ryt?!.....LOL 
  ignoring that I said the change noticed was a state of weightlessness.. not a 
change of velocity..
  Phil..if there is a change from 30 gms to 0 grms (as detected on our 
scale).....then we have a change. that change is due to going from 0 velocity 
to some other velocity, .............. as is the case with a suspended elevator 
i mentioned ................That is a not only just a change in the velocity of 
the elevator but a change in velocity wrt magnitude which is an acceleration by 
definition... and it was detectable...I also addressed what happens once we are 
in free fall and then change from 32 ft per sec/ per sec in any given direction 
and explained& demonstrated why and how even assuming MS's own 
constructs................

Other related posts: