[geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:35:46 +1000
getting sidetracked
I hope not Jack .. We are just doing our usual natter whilst waiting .I know
he has a hard one to answer. It'll take time, and this is background stuff dont
you think? ..
Philip
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Lewis
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:08 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment
Philip etc.
Do you not think that Regner is getting sidetracked from the 1st of the 5
points - the M & M experiment?
Jack
Regner Trampedach wrote:
Regner in dark red (only one paragraph).
philip madsen wrote:
Allen I do not get any coherence from you here.
Are you trying to rewrite the physics book..
Acceleration is change of direction or velocity. end of story. A body in
circular motion is accelerating.. You can't change that.
Also you rubbish and joke about relativity and yet try to call on it
often in support of your jokes..
As regards relativity, I support practical relativity so long as anything
Einstein or his supporters says does not come into it.. The real relationship
between moving bodies. To bring in frames of reference is a convenience for
calculations .Like I said to the passenger in the jet, the ball dropped 18
inches. . It is not a reality.. Well it does not have to be a reality..
Practical relativity.. When you drop a ball in a moving train it only
looks like it moves in a straight line.. It doesn't.. Its an illusion... Just
as seeing the sun rise could be an illusion.
Why is it an illusion?!?!
Why isn't it just a matter of perspective?
Both are equally real - they just depend on where you watch from.
- Regner
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date: 18/03/2008
8:10 AM
Other related posts:
