[geocentrism] Re: acceleration calcs attachment

  • From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:08:24 +0000

Philip etc.
Do you not think that Regner is getting sidetracked from the 1st of the 5 points - the M & M experiment?

Jack

Regner Trampedach wrote:
Regner in dark red (only one paragraph).

philip madsen wrote:
Allen I do not get any coherence from you here.
Are you trying to rewrite the physics book.. Acceleration is change of direction or velocity. end of story. A body in circular motion is accelerating.. You can't change that. Also you rubbish and joke about relativity and yet try to call on it often in support of your jokes.. As regards relativity, I support practical relativity so long as anything Einstein or his supporters says does not come into it.. The real relationship between moving bodies. To bring in frames of reference is a convenience for calculations .Like I said to the passenger in the jet, the ball dropped 18 inches. . It is not a reality.. Well it does not have to be a reality.. Practical relativity.. When you drop a ball in a moving train it only looks like it moves in a straight line.. It doesn't.. Its an illusion... Just as seeing the sun rise could be an illusion.
Why is it an illusion?!?!
Why isn't it just a matter of perspective?
Both are equally real - they just depend on where you watch from.

      - Regner

Other related posts: