Why does the universe have to "wobble ... to account for the seasons"? Neville. When the sun goes North and south, do all the stars do likewise? If so then the universe must have an annual vibration north and south.. I spose that is not a wobble. but an oscillation.. Phil. ----- Original Message ----- From: Neville Jones To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:44 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception Allen, The "famous" solar eclipse to which you are probably refering is the one that Eddington used to promote OneStone to sainthood, 1919. Why does the universe have to "wobble ... to account for the seasons"? Neville. -----Original Message----- From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT) To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception Yes, the beam is subject to the eastbound aether #2 when < GSD and the west bound aether between GSD and the Moon. Until we know the exact variation of the aether (the PD graph) we can't say what the net effect will be . The aether near the Earth is stronger than near the Moon, but the light travels through more of the westbound aether. I await the bud-nipping answer. I agree in principle. However, i think you are going to find at the end of the day that the aether effects on EMR are slightly different then on mass that is to say the amount of deflection/ force will not match exactly....Dr Hanson also proposed this and i asked him about it based on the necessity of a light trajectory change due to parallax if you assume the earth at the exact center with no wobble in the universe to account for the seasons.......I think you are going to have to incorporated more data then just the PD diagram to extrapolate the aether bending effects on EMR(light) . I might also suggest using the effects of "gravitational lenseing" ( although it would not caused by gravity but by gravities medium) effect might be a lousy source for hard data but perhaps a good ball park or indicator for the amount of EMR deflection due to travailing though a medium of varying currents. The problem you will ultimately encounter is that in order to know the exact amount oyou going to need to know the source and every current of every CB it passes though and to know that you will need the motions of every one of those CB’s.. I think you might be able to use the famous 1911( did i get the date right?) Solar eclipse data ..? There you would have a known source and a known Body and the motions of the two...This should give you the amount of EMR defection due to passing through the Aether medium of differing currents. In any case EMR may not be affected in the same way or to the same degree that mass is...energy and mass or two entirely different states within the aether .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One-click Webmail Access - Easily monitor & access your email accounts! Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 2/08/2007 2:22 PM