[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Yea sure but it could but it would require one kind of answer for one type of
parallax and another for these others......it could be yes......... but, we
will most definitely be accused of being inconsistent and convenient in our
explanations...I think a wobble at least in the sun's orbit if not the whole
universe is a far more belivable solution......?
Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: This is the modified Tychonic
model, but I feel no necessity to tie the stars to the Sun.
Parallax and aberration can simply be current motion within the aether, perhaps
as planetary motion is?
Neville.
-----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception
These are also good ref and background for EMR and aether effects
perhaps........
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thanks Nevile, Yes
1919.......i forgot ...these are very short and relevant background..please
read....
http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no115/editor.pdf
http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no115/par-ab-rev.pdf
This is one of the reasons Bouw assumes a Wobble in the universe with the
period of the suns anual motion to account for these paralax issues as well as
the near and far distance relationship to the earth and sun..AKA the seasons
---------------------------------
Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get Free Radio & MP3 Player &
Recorder
Learn more at www.inbox.com/radio
Other related posts:
