-----Original Message----- From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of philip madsen Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 7:33 PM To: geocentrism list Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception Hooray! another piece of intellectual property release from the GWW, for us poorer class intellectual peasants.. thanks Robert. er I dont suppose you could give us just a we bit more about this NASA experiment and that lack of aberration in the return signal.. The world's most prolific surfer should be able to background research the lunar laser ranging details on Net. It just takes time, not $. Then there's always Ask NASA and the Bad Ast forum. I realy do not see why aberration comes into it. If it takes 2 seconds to get here, then the antennaes even at ordinary radio beam will find an offset in space of quite some distance relatively, given the velocity a the equator. Now I need to get some perspective, and perhaps all may need it. 1. A radio signal takes 2 seconds to do the distance luna to earth. 2. A 2 millisecond pulse after it leaves the moon antenna, having no mass or inertia will travel in a straight line independently of any further movement of the moon or its g forces. 3. It will also travel in a straight line, no curves for the fructuous, independent of the movements of the earth . or any gravitional forces thereof. ( no einstein please) 4. If the pulse was sent during that time when luna was 90 degrees inside the alleged earths orbit around the sun, then the receiving antennae on earth will be moving forward around the sun at 2.978473 x 104 m/s The issue is linear motion, not orbital Robert B I dunno about anyone else but it seems to me that the pulze is going to miss the antenna by more than 60 kilometers. Miss is arbitary .. I mean miss the peak amplitude.. One is comparing signal strengths on the curve between in focus and off focus.. Philip.