[geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:04:00 +1000
I'm sure that you are correct Neville. especially as The fields rapidly deploy,
and redeploy as fast as is necessary (even light speed) to concentrate the
union of their initially separate fields as they come together (a closed
magnetic circuit) . As I said, an awfully complex bit of math.. like
impossible..
I know that the moving magnet can be accelerated into through and out of the
field without capture, but all of the input attraction as energy at the
approach will be equally required to force the escape. There will be no gain of
energy from the flyby..
Thus I was wondering just how energy can be taken by a satellite in the
socalled slingshot flyby of Jupiter to propell it further from the Sun... That
gravity and magnetism are different forces should not alter the basic premise
that energy gained by a fall is recovered during the climb... or visa versa..
Philip.
PS In case it was not noticed I am searching for the flaw in the smot linear
motor demonstration I showed earlier..
----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:02 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
Philip,
I do not know how you intend to ensure that your magnet is always "at right
angles to" the external magnetic field. Just the finite length of the magnet
will ensure that this is, I would think, impossible in a strong field (and only
approximately true in a weak one). Sounds like you need an expert in nuclear
physics; have you tried CERN ?
As regards Maxwell's work, the modern version of his field equations is a
simplification of his actual analysis, which included scalar as well as vector
terms.
Neville.
philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Its evening, and Im in a friendlier mood.. Its been a long day for me but
I left Josh up there in the subject line.
If I had not balked at calculus, I might have gotten to like math.. Today i
had confirmed some of my disbeliefs, and unconfirmed some of my beliefs. I was
unsure that mag fields worked according to inverse square law... Now I know
they dont. because inverse sq only works for a point source .. Even light
doesn't if it is coming from a flat plane, and electric fields do not if they
are coming from a linear conductor.. hmm
So I just got a problem that is so complex it needs a High priest of math.
In the sense that gravity causes acceleration because it is a constant, how
does one calculate the acceleration on a unit pole from a magnetic field that
is not constant universally???
No one on google knows.. But experiment shows that the force between
magnets increases rapidly with decreasing distance..
My experiment.. I want to shoot a magnet oriented for poles attracting
very close to but through and at right angles to a powerful magnetic field. If
it is too slow it will get captured.. How do I calculate the escape velocity
for a fly past.??? would there be one?
I mean, a mag field can accelerate a particle up to the speed of light.
I just bet this will cause pages of calculations???
Philip.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up
for your free account today.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/778 - Release Date: 27/04/2007
1:39 PM
Other related posts:
