[geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:57:29 +0000 (GMT)
Philip M
From philip madsen Sat Apr 28 21:34:54 2007
Paul surely you can see what I rightfully condemn in MS when they make the
following statement..
"To really understand the solar system we have to go back where it began and it
began with comets."
Notice the contradiction of ideas. First the admission of not really
understanding, which is ok, but then the assertion, "it began with comets" .
thats only a wild guess.. Yet students will believe he is stating a fact...
They do it all the time...
Of course I will not contest what you say. One finds examples like this
everywhere. The human brain commonly seems quite incapable of seeing beyond the
first order implications of what is being said and similarly blind to the fact
that a criticism against one's adversaries may very well apply equally to
oneself. (eg the beam vs mote in the eye etc). Intolerance to ideas which are
at variance with our own will put blinkers on most, who are commonly simply
looking for the first opportunity to condemn all of what they are hearing. To
have one's argument prevail, to annhiliate an opponent's position, to squash
one's enemy are primitive and powerful motivators. To see merit or reason in
onother's argument is less common.
This little philosophical digression is a long way from the topic of Magnets so
you won't mind if I include something from the Aether debate. But in any case,
havn't we also established that consensus is no proof...? Again I concede your
point but it doesn't exclude the possibility of being correct or the increased
probability of being correct. Alternatively, you cannot say that truth is
defined by uniqueness. I once owned a pair of trousers which I perceived to be
green but on one occasion, after several such similar instances of being told
they were grey, I decided to look more closely. With optical magnification I
was able to see that the fabric was woven with one strand of green for every
four strands of grey. Shortly after this, upon failing two items in the
Ishihara test, I questioned my examiner on the matter. He assured me that there
was a line from 'x' to 'y', and that I had an insensitivity to grey. In this
case the majority were correct. So while contrary
concensus may not be proof, it is certainly an occasion for examining one's
own position more closely than usual.
Paul D
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [geocentrism] dignity, principle and discipline.
- From: philip madsen
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- » [geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment
- [geocentrism] dignity, principle and discipline.
- From: philip madsen