[geocentrism] Re: Magnet experiment

You are right the gravitational field in MS does not rotate which goes to 
further point out the fact that I motioned earlier about the MS model.   Only 
orbital energy could be the culprit if there is any for MS?I Assume that 
slingshots happen and if that is the case then they cannot be getting that 
energy transfer from the planets rotation but if they are getting energy from  
rotation then Ms is wrong and this would emphatically demonstrate the aether 
medium.. for only a aether could impart kinetic energy to a satellite that 
passes into its vortices due to the planets spin or the aethers spin about a  
fixed earth?  MS has no mechanism for imparting centrifugal force without 
coming into physical contact with the planet for the exact reason that you gave 
the gravitational field dose not rotate in MS  ( it can in the AVGM of GS ref: 
discussions on tides) as such there is no possible way a body can impart 
centrifugal fore to another body without  either coming into physical
 contact with the body or there is a medium that just as in the case of the 
aspden motor allows for a transfer of centrifugal force energy to and from the 
aether medium?.


"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    If the bar magnet producing 
the magnetic field is rotating then there will be extra energy imparted if your 
magnet flies by in the same direction, but the World's gravitational field does 
not rotate, otherwise satellites going "against" the field would need far more 
energy to overcome this resistance, which is not observed in reality.
   
  Neville.
  

philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
            As I said before, Philip, gravity slingshots are rubbish, since the 
speed gained on approach must be lost again on recession.
   
  Neville
   
  Yet I forgot something . Neville.. If jupiter was on a path away from the sun 
, at velocity N and the satellite flyby curved by in the same direction, would 
it not impart some extra pull away from the sun to the satellite?   
   
  I imagined what if the magnet I was shooting at was rotating away from me 
when I shot the steel ball very close past it in the same direction.. Do we not 
have three forces acting on the ball..  One attraction in ...second partial 
capture which carries it along from its own motion, and the third the pull back 
which is equal to one, the atraction...  This leaves the net force due to the 
rotation of the large magnet. 
   
   
  Phil. 
   
  PS    and I just noticed, Allen come up with similar, except I used the 
orbital motion of the planet not the rotation... But I think that is what allen 
meant when he mentioned the magnet experiment..   thanks Allen


    
---------------------------------
  Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it 
now.

Other related posts: