[geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:15:33 -0000
Hi Paul,
Wow! That's what I call an amazing spelling error. A spell checker would not
have noticed that! I know that there are those who would see it as God gently
pointing out something to me. :-)
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 4:38 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing
Jack L
This heliocentrist is NOT saying that the second (annual revolution) motion
cannot be detected. I have been describing how it CAN be detected for a year
and a half but unfortunately this seems to be in most everyone's dark cupboard
into which none of you seem to have the courage look.
I've tried to remove the subject from this emotional exclusion zone by
shifting the phenomenon to Mars but that didn't work either. See several short
posts "Translational motion of Mars".
Egocentrism? Spelling error or is there a point here that I am missing?
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 19 November, 2007 9:08:38 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing
Dear All,
In the heliocentric model it would appear that there are two movements taking
place, which is not disputed, but the observations support only one movement-
egocentrism. The heliocentrists seem to be saying that the second movement
cannot be detected for reasons I do not understand. Will it help if I ask the
question, why can't it be detected if it exists? We can't see the moon turning
actually but we know it does simply by the observations and dynamics involved.
Therefore I would expect the helios to be able to do the same.
Jack
Other related posts:
