On 28 Jun, Phillip Marsden <phillip.marsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Paul Vigay wrote:
In a dim and distant universe
<ac282fb64f.steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve
Fryatt <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> enlightened us thusly:
Huh? Have you ever /seen/ a copy of Personal Accountz,
Paul?
I've seen a copy of the current Accountz yes. Mainly
because a friend wanted an accounts package and I
recommended Prophet, but as that's not available anymore
(and he also has a PC) he bought a copy of Accountz. He
then phoned me up saying he didn't think it was very good
- so I went round to have a look - which is when I was
shocked to see how slow it was.
Thus neatly side-stepping the issue of appearance, which is
what you passed comment about. What did I tell you Steve
(Fryatt)? He found a way to side-step your question.
Come on, Paul, tell us why this product in particular and
Java applications in general are dreadful in appearance.
Also tell us why Java applications should be dreadful in
appearance simply because they are written in Java.
No please don't.
Its not relevant to Davids software as we dont have a modern
Java interpreter and the tone of your recent postings has been
over agressive. If you both wish to debate it take it to
email.
Fin
