[bksvol-discuss] Re: validating
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Hope,
I chuckled when I read the part of your post that I've
saved below. That suggestion has been made before by
frustrated valdiators, especially because there's one
person in particular who, at least before, was
throwing up very poor scans. It has been suggested
that her scans be rejected automatically and/or that
she be told not to submit any more. I don't know what
has happened, or whether she is still submitting. I
have downloaded a number of her scans to correct, for
which I can obtain the books, and one of her friends
who is also a very careful validator seems to be doing
that also. If I am enjoying the book, I will take the
time to fix it. They are, so far, books that are
worthwhile having in the collection for other people
to enjoy. So far I've rejected one that was not only
really bad but that was long and that I wasn't
enjoying. The one I finished and the one I'm working
on are fine in some places and really chopped up in
others. (I wonder, from your description, if your book
was submitted by the same person -- but no names here,
please).
Cindy
Cindy
-. Is there a way
> to disallow people who do a poor job from scanning?
> It eats up peoples time
> if they are serious about validating. I for one will
> not submit a scan until
> I ensure it is correct. It would be better for
> people to submit 1 excellent
> scan then 10 fair scans.
> Have a nice day.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
