[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

  • From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:09:38 -0600

Hi Marissa,

Thanks for clearing that oone up.  II do sometimes recommend that because
some validators have very advanced equipment and if I think a book has a
chance I would release it back as well.

Sue

----- Original Message -----
From: <bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question


In reading that sentence, it definitely didn't make sense. I meant to
say that I do occasionally kick back a rejected book if the validator
who worked on it requests it.

Marissa

-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marissa Mika
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:12 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

I don't claim to know the answer nor the innerworkings of the approval
master's mind (which is why I'm CCing him on this).

Occasionally, I'll kick a book back to a validator who has rejected the
book but has then requested that it be kicked back to the validator has
specifically requested it (maybe due to the fact that they've gotten
missing pages and can complete the book, etc).

On the few approvals that I have done, I haven't kicked any rejected
books back to the download cue.

Marissa

-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:23 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

Well, that, in my view, is absurd. marissa, can we get a reading on
this? If a validator says text quality is poor and needs a rescan and
rejects the book, why would the admin kick that back? What is the point
of
rejecting if validators will be second guessed by the admin?
Mary










Other related posts: