[beports] Re: Changeset 60
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:32:45 +0200
On 2008-05-19 at 10:06:29 [+0200], Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
wrote:
> Am 19.05.2008 um 09:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> > Am 19.05.2008 um 00:09 schrieb Ingo Weinhold:
> >
> >> I wasn't aware that you diffed against an official branch. In
> >> fact I wasn't even aware that that neon 0.25 is still maintained.
> >
> > I don't know either, but mine says 0.25.5 and your patch is
> > supposedly against 0.25.4, that could be an indication that there is
> > some maintainance for 0.25.x, just like for old apr 0.9.x. (I
> > managed to get a minor BeOS fix merged into that branch some weeks
> > ago.)
There's at least no indication on the website, that 0.25 is still
maintained (the releases appear only in the archived release history).
That's quite different from APR where 0.9 and 1.2 series are equally
prominent on the website.
> Btw I don't remember encountering autoconf issues in the 0.25.x
> branch. Your nice Wiki page addition does remind me that I need to add
> instructions how to checkout the code I am working against. ;-)
That would be nice.
CU, Ingo
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
