atw: Re: de argentum defence
- From: "Brian Clarke" <brianclarke01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:07:25 +1100
Poor diddums.
You may note that I criticised your puff for its total lack of facts.
You then moved to ad hominem attack. You stick to 'features' and I'll stick
to facts.
%&*% off, to paraphrase Janice's offering..
Brian.
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: The New World Order, take 2
- atw: Re: The New World Order, take 2
- atw: Re: The New World Order, take 2
- atw: Re: The New World Order, take 2.5
- atw: The New World Order, Christine's final word
- atw: Re: The New World Order, Christine's final word
- atw: The New World Order, Christine's confession (too long for short concentration spans)
- atw: Re: The New World Order, Christine's confession (too long for short concentration spans)
- atw: Re: The New World Order, Christine's confession (too long for short concentration spans)
- atw: Re: The New World Order, Christine's confession (too long for short concentration spans)
- atw: Re: The New World Order, Christine's confession (too long for short concentration spans)
- atw: Re: The New World Order
- atw: Re: The New World Order
- atw: Re: The New World Order
- atw: Re: The New World Order
Other related posts:
