[AR] Re: "Direct" Hydrogen Peroxide engines

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:44:44 -0700

Why assume screens? This sounds like it would lend itself to winding catalyst-clad wire under tension in a criss-cross pattern around the central perforated tube.

If you want further compression, size things so that heating the outer tube and cryo chilling the wire-wound inner tube before assembling them makes them a tight fit.

On 9/17/2016 7:47 PM, Robert Steinke wrote:

Robert,

It sounds like the Condor had axial flow from top to bottom.  I think
what Paul is suggesting is radial flow from inside to outside with a
solid bottom plate and a perforated side wall letting the flow out into
a surrounding chamber.

I think Paul's idea has a lot of potential.  One issue with it is
pre-compressing the screens.  With axial flow you can press them down
with a hydraulic press.  How can you pre-compress the screens radially
from inside to outside?

Bob Steinke

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:42 PM, <qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    That is the way the Condor cat pack was made except we injected from
    the top. We tried center injection but the
    peroxide never got to the outer screens so we went back to top
    injection. No channel rings cause the screen
    is tight against the wall of the catpack.

    Robert


    At 01:58 PM 9/16/2016, you wrote:

        Now suppose that you build the cat pack as a hollow spool....
        The Catpack material is rectangular (no waste) and is wound
        around the spool...
        The as the H2O2 goes from liquid at the center to Gas at the
        outside the area of the cat pack increases
        So one would expect a lower pressure drop.  One can increase
        the length of the tubular section without increasing
        Â the anti channeling area....Â





Other related posts: