[argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz <nospam456@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:36:19 +0200
Graeme Gill wrote:
> I'm not sure there is any way of dealing with this type of issue
> without side effects. The most transparent "fix" would be to grab
> the gamut from the profile supplied with the -S options from the
> perceptual intent, [...]
Eventually I see no other way either to estimate the "reference gamut"
in the PCS, which was assumed by the -S profile as source gamut for the
gamut mapping.
Regards,
Gerhard
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill