[argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g

Graeme Gill wrote:
> Not too hard, but your profile won't be quite right, because profile
> expects instrument readings, which are equivalent to ICC-absolute.

But since we want to use this profile only to define a gamut in the
_PCS_, I think it is OK [if not better] that these fake readings assume
a D50 white point, and not the native media white point of the
device/medium. And in the PCS, relative and absolute numbers are the
same anyway.

Regards,
Gerhard

> Fake test points from the other intent tables will have had their
> white points normalised to PCS white.

Other related posts: