[argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz <nospam456@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:30:19 +0200
Graeme Gill wrote:
>> Eventually I see no other way either to estimate the "reference
>> gamut" in the PCS, which was assumed by the -S profile as source
>> gamut for the gamut mapping.
>
> Yes, I think that's the right solution. In fact I should generate
> separate gamuts from the saturation and perceptual A2B tables, in case
> they are different.
Sure. I'm generally considering "saturation" as "yet another perceptual"
intent, using a different gamut mapping.
-Gerhard
- References:
- [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- » [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- [argyllcms] profile -S -g
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: profile -S -g
- From: Graeme Gill