[argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Klaus Karcher <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:48:03 +0100
Klaus Karcher wrote:Interesting. If I got it right, you consider a low slope as indication for channel saturation? It's exciting to see how sensitive this indicator becomes at the end of the scale:<http://digitalproof.info/argyll/inklimits-DeltaEslope.pdf>
Graeme Gill wrote:
That was the idea. Of course some smoothing would help in picking a robust stopping point.
I tested some smoothing algorithms with my data (see <http://digitalproof.info/argyll/inklimits-DeltaEslope-sm.pdf>).
Your method is definitely worth to be evaluated in practice. Moreover I think it is applicable to several similar problems (e.g. sensor calibration) -- I'll certainly recall it next time when I have to deal with issues like that.
Thank you :-) Klaus
- References:
- [argyllcms] Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Martin Weberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Martin Weberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - edmund ronald
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Devadas Varma
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Of ink limiting and maximizing gamut - Graeme Gill