[argyllcms] Re: Camera matrix profile, adding ti3 perfect white data set

  • From: Elle Stone <l.elle.stone@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:25:21 -0500

On 1/22/10, Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2010 Jan 22, at 9:23 AM, Klaus Karcher wrote:
>
>> Elle Stone wrote:
>>> An issue with camera matrix profiles made with v1.0.4 was that the
>>> brightest patch got scaled to L=100, for reasons that make sense for a
>>> printer profile but not so much for a camera profile.
>>
>> you are right IMHO -- it doesn't make much sense for me either. But it is
>> the "expected" behavior for an ICC compliant input (i.e scanner or camera)
>> profile.
>
> Isn't that the point of colprof's -u flag...? Or am I missing something...?
>
> b&

I think "-u" only works with lut profiles? I've been making a
"single-gamma + matrix" "-aG" camera profile.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2010