[Wittrs] Correction - Re: What would Wittgenstein have said?
- From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:19:16 -0000
Where I wrote: "though I think Dennett's effort is finally doomed by his
attachment to the idea of first-personness" I should, of course, have written
"Searle's effort". (I was too lazy to double check my words before hitting
"send" so I guess that's what I get!
SWM
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "SWM" <SWMirsky@...> wrote:
><snip>
>
> Searle takes a more traditionally philosophic view with his formal argument
> from the Chinese Room (even if it is deeply mistaken on my view) but his
> approach, which does try to step out of the existing linguistic categories
> and modes of classification, also seems to partake of Wittgenstein though I
> think Dennett's effort is finally doomed by his attachment to the idea of
> first-personness.
>
> <snip>
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
