In a message dated 27/09/2009 03:14:26 GMT Daylight Time, SWMirsky@xxxxxxx writes: --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Cayuse" <z.z7@...> wrote: I'm not sure what you have in mind by "eliminativism". If you would specify what you mean AND it is something I think I uderstand, I will offer my thoughts, of course, for what they're worth. As I understand it, "eliminativism" is a particular thesis concerning the mind. What do you take this thesis to be? Are you after a discussion of the standard or traditional expressions of the thesis (in which case we can Google it and take what is available on wikipedia and/or the Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy and go from there. SWM Gentlemen: I am really enjoying the privilege of eavedropping on your fascinating discussion. If I (as a life-long eliminativist) may make a brief comment on eliminativism? I would like to mention that eliminativism isn't confined to the domain of specialised neurological (Philosophy of Mind) discourse associated with Paul and Mary Churchland (Eliminative Materialism.) Eliminativism is also very much a psycho-linguistic subject of colloquy nowadays and I see it as the main tool of resistance against the spectre which is haunting philosophy - the spectre of reification - a global reification of interpersonal and intersocietal language which has haunted philosophy for millennia, but has now proliferated and become even more dangerous to human understanding and world peace in a way much more dangerous than the ghost of Marx's communism or Hitler's Nazism which haunted Europe. Sincerely, Jud Evans The Athenaeum Library of Philosophy. Private Website: (http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm) http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Reifications (like biological entozoic infections of the gut) are proto -socio-neurological enculturations and as useful fictions are not necessarily symbiotic with, nor necessarily benignly adjuvant to the welfare of their unwitting and often naive hosts. Jud Evans. Freedom in humans consists of the ability to liberate oneself from the tyranny of reificationalist imprinting. Antonio Rossin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Sincerely, Jud Evans Private Website: (http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm) http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Reifications (like biological entozoic infections of the gut) are proto -socio-neurological enculturations and as useful fictions are not necessarily symbiotic with, nor necessarily benignly adjuvant to the welfare of their unwitting and often naive hosts. Jud Evans. Freedom in humans consists of the ability to liberate oneself from the tyranny of reificationalist imprinting. Antonio Rossin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------