On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:00:21 -0000 MJ Ray <markj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bill Meahan <wmeahan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Er, folks, please try not to forget folks who **aren't** using > > Linux, > > Some arch implementations should run on other platforms. At least two > are written in cross-platform scripting languages. It doesn't even > require you to give your personal details to a development company ;-) > No doubt. GNU software can usually be coerced into compiling/running on any U**x/U**x-like platform. The issue I have is that every time I want/need to install some application from source, I end up having to install umpty-ump development tools just to be able to compile the bloody thing so I can use it. The more different tools free-software developers choose to use, the more I, an end-user, have to install and keep up to date. Either that, or I have to hope somebody else will do it so there is a binary package available for my platform(s). For extremely-popular packages, that's usually not much of a problem since up-to-date or (at least) recent binary packages are usually available. For less-popular (or more narrowly-focused) applications, however, finding a binary package that's up-to-date or recent is frequently an exercise in futility hence installation from source becomes a necessity. I'm retired from software development (after 38 years without a single line of COBOL) and have no intention at all of returning to it so, personally, I don't give a rip_which_ development tools get used. just that there be a _really_ small number of them so *I* don't have to have that many of them :-) -- Bill Meahan wmeahan@xxxxxxxxxx /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign "Never ascribe to mailce what can be \ / No HTML/RTF in email adequately explained by stupidity X No Word docs in email -- Robert Heinlein / \ Respect for open standards Ham: WA8TZG GMRS: WPXM723