Tim Roberts wrote: >>"we didn't >>know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't >>plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan >>whether or not something better is available." I AM AW AWARE OF VISTA RDP. we have not chosen rdp audio because MY CLIENT DON'T WANED IT (and i cant ask my client the reason). On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Tim Roberts <timr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dennis Scott wrote: > > My server is a customized application, due to some reasons i cant use > > built in RDP sound sorry ;) > > I'm now going to climb on my soapbox. > > "Due to some reasons"? What that really says to me is that "we didn't > know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't > plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan > whether or not something better is available." > > The RIGHT thing to do is to step back for a few days and figure out how > you can take advantage of what RDP can already do. It is utterly > foolish to waste time re-inventing something that already works, instead > of adapting what you have to use the existing tool. > > End of soapbox. > > -- > Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. > > ****************** > > WDMAUDIODEV addresses: > Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe > Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: > http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/ > >