The reason MIGHT be IS, They got lot of audio applications which were running good on 200 and xp but to run on vista they have to completly re-architect their applications. So they dont want to depend. who knows if tommoro morning MS decides to change some core functionality which were using by the application for years. *"THIS IS JUST MY OPINION"* dennis.scott On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Frank Yerrace <Frank.Yerrace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > >MY CLIENT DON'T WANED IT (and i cant ask my client the reason) > > > > I’d be interested in know the reasons. Was it something in the audio > system? Something more related to Remote Desktop? I understand you might not > be able to, but if you can get such information to me or connect me with > your customer I would appreciate it. Without this kind of information, we > it’s very hard to improve our product (Windows) to meet the needs of these > customers. > > > > Frank Yerrace > > Microsoft Corporation > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > > *From:* wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Scott > *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:41 AM > *To:* wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [wdmaudiodev] Re: Audio devices for terminal servers. > > > > Tim Roberts wrote: > >>"we didn't > >>know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't > >>plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan > >>whether or not something better is available." > > I AM AW AWARE OF VISTA RDP. we have not chosen rdp audio because MY CLIENT > DON'T WANED IT (and i cant ask my client the reason). > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Tim Roberts <timr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dennis Scott wrote: > > My server is a customized application, due to some reasons i cant use > > built in RDP sound sorry ;) > > I'm now going to climb on my soapbox. > > "Due to some reasons"? What that really says to me is that "we didn't > know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't > plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan > whether or not something better is available." > > The RIGHT thing to do is to step back for a few days and figure out how > you can take advantage of what RDP can already do. It is utterly > foolish to waste time re-inventing something that already works, instead > of adapting what you have to use the existing tool. > > End of soapbox. > > -- > Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. > > ****************** > > WDMAUDIODEV addresses: > Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe > Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: > http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/ > > >