[tinwhiskers] Re: AW: [RoHSUSAPushback] Connection failure in the super collider
- From: "Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <Dewey.Whittaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:33:57 -0700
John,
I'll help. May the farce be with you.
Dewey
________________________________
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Klaus Reindl
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:22 PM
To: RoHSUSAPushback@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Leadfree'; 'TechNet';
tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] AW: [RoHSUSAPushback] Connection failure in the
super collider
John,
I can imagine what are you expecting:
The connection failing had been done with Pb-free solder, such as SAC
type.
I am not sure. Work on the Super Collider might have started before RoHS
becoming effective.
Besides, the whole application is exempt from it.
Finally, considering the really low temperatures in the collider ring
tunnel,
Tin Plague may be the problem one should have considered possible.
Anyway, as you say, an 8D report on this gigantic solder joint
issue-costing Millions-
would be utmost interesting.
Possibly, with the power of the Group behind you, you could get a copy?
Best regards, Klaus
Klaus G. Reindl
rRC
Reliable Reliability Consulting
Seitenhalde 108/2
D 72793 Pfullingen
xx49 7121 799533
klaus-reindl@xxxxxxxxxxx
________________________________
Von: RoHSUSAPushback@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:RoHSUSAPushback@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von John Burke
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Oktober 2008 23:32
An: Leadfree; TechNet; tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
RoHSUSAPushback@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [RoHSUSAPushback] Connection failure in the super collider
Wonder if we will ever get a failure analysis on this. Interesting that
the whole thing is kept super cold:
Link is here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081006/ap_on_re_eu/eu_particle_collider
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081006/ap_on_re_eu/eu_particle_collider>
John Burke
(408) 515 4992
Other related posts:
