[THIN] Re: Zone Data Collector Enquiry
- From: Loren Wheatly <lorenwheatly@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:40:33 +1000
Hi
Yes, we have 10 servers per site. All servers in 1 zone due to the fact we
have gig links. Good idea... I may look at using 1 physical server per
site as ZDC. Will look at limiting connections to perhaps 20 users to
ensure they are not starved.. What are the implications from a ZDC
perspective if the servers are busy whilst requests are coming thru? Will
Citrix connections be slower?
Thanks for the great suggestion
Loren
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would do a dedicated zdc and then a secondary zdc with a load rule
> to take fewer users than other servers.
>
> You said you have 20 servers. Is that 10 per site? You might be able
> to get away with just a reduced user load on the primary zdc at each
> location then.
>
> There's overhead for being a zdc. You don't want to starve it.
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Loren Wheatly <lorenwheatly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a farm of 20 Windows 2003 XenApp 4.5 servers (Physical) across 2
> sites which are connected by dual Gig links. I have a dedicated ZDC which
> is virtual. Im looking demising the ZDC and making one of the 20 existing
> Physical servers the ZDC. What are peoples thoughts on this? Is it
> preferable to have a VM ZDC solely for this function? My farm is
> underutilised - runs at 50% so there is capacity. Wondering what your
> thoughts and what best practice is.
> >
> > Also are there any issues with running the ZDC function on a WIndows 2008
> server? All other servers in the farm are Windows 2003..
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
>
Other related posts: