[THIN] Re: Zone Data Collector Enquiry
- From: Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 09:53:55 -0400
Dedicate the ZDC and keep it the same OS as the rest of the farm (ie win2003)
bitness wouldn't matter. That will save you alot of headaches in the future
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2011, at 9:30, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would do a dedicated zdc and then a secondary zdc with a load rule
> to take fewer users than other servers.
>
> You said you have 20 servers. Is that 10 per site? You might be able
> to get away with just a reduced user load on the primary zdc at each
> location then.
>
> There's overhead for being a zdc. You don't want to starve it.
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Loren Wheatly <lorenwheatly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a farm of 20 Windows 2003 XenApp 4.5 servers (Physical) across 2
>> sites which are connected by dual Gig links. I have a dedicated ZDC which
>> is virtual. Im looking demising the ZDC and making one of the 20 existing
>> Physical servers the ZDC. What are peoples thoughts on this? Is it
>> preferable to have a VM ZDC solely for this function? My farm is
>> underutilised - runs at 50% so there is capacity. Wondering what your
>> thoughts and what best practice is.
>>
>> Also are there any issues with running the ZDC function on a WIndows 2008
>> server? All other servers in the farm are Windows 2003..
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
