[THIN] Re: Citrix farms over a WAN

  • From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:26:04 -0700

Odd ball indeed... Most corporations have their WAN links go to their
primary Data Center and to their DR site...  So only two sets of servers are
required.

The key will be to keep the number of zones to a minimum.

Joe

On 5/22/06, Tony Lyne <Tony.Lyne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey Mark,



Yes it's a bit of an odd ball design request.



The driver behind this particular design is they need a 24x7 uptime and
have each site totally autonomous in the case of a WAN failure. But don't
want the hassle of having 27 separate farms to manage (understandable).



*Tony Lyne
Consultant*

*Senior Systems Engineer*





+64 6 353 7300

<http://www.gen-i.co.nz>

+64 6 356 6800

+64 27 472 0696

tony.lyne@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.gen-i.co.nz

172-174 Broadway Avenue, PO Box 1470,
Palmerston North, New Zealand

"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me
immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this
communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that
this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes
of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."


------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Landin, Mark
*Sent:* Tuesday, 23 May 2006 9:26 a.m.
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: Citrix farms over a WAN



That seems like one ... unorthodox? ... architecture to me. Care to
clarify the details that are leading to this design? (Not saying it's wrong,
just saying I can't think of the real-world problem this solution is looking
for...)


------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Tony Lyne
*Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2006 4:02 PM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Citrix farms over a WAN

Guys/Gals,



I've been given a project to scope out a citrix farm design which consists
of 27 sites with 2 load balanced Citrix servers on each site. The client
needs it in this configuration for specific redundancy reasons (ie WAN
redundancy etc…)



Does any one know what the limitations on having a single farm span across
27 sites (limited bandwidth available as well).



I was planning on specifying a zone for each site, and disabling load
balancing across zones in MPS 4.



Any other pointers would be much appreciated.



Thanks,

*Tony Lyne
Consultant*

*Senior Systems Engineer*





+64 6 353 7300

<http://www.gen-i.co.nz>

+64 6 356 6800

+64 27 472 0696

tony.lyne@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.gen-i.co.nz

172-174 Broadway Avenue, PO Box 1470,
Palmerston North, New Zealand

"This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me
immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this
communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that
this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes
of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."







Other related posts: