Yes I've heard of the Kiss terminology. I'm not interested in getting into a debate about the overall design rationale of their network as it would take too long to outline to business drivers behind their current infrastructure. I'm only interested in hearing from people who have done an implementation like this with PS4 in the real world. BTW: Dispersed databackup etc are not an issue here. Tony Lyne Consultant Senior Systems Engineer +64 6 353 7300 +64 6 356 6800 +64 27 472 0696 tony.lyne@xxxxxxxxxxx www.gen-i.co.nz 172-174 Broadway Avenue, PO Box 1470, Palmerston North, New Zealand "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders Sent: Tuesday, 23 May 2006 10:04 a.m. To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix farms over a WAN So where will all the back-end data and servers be located? How will dispersed data be backed up? What's the point in deploying Citrix if you are not going to centralize it? What benefits will the customer see? What is the business driver? You are better off building redundancy into the WAN. For example: Depending on how many users per site you could have a primary link that may be 1M/1M SHDSL with a backup of 128k ISDN. (This is Australian terminology. So I'm not sure of the WAN terchnologies available in your part of the world). Have you heard the KISS theory? Cheers. Kind regards, Jeremy Saunders Senior Technical Specialist Infrastructure Technology Services (ITS) & Cerulean Global Technology Services (GTS) IBM Australia Level 2, 1060 Hay Street West Perth WA 6005 Visit us at http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its P: +61 8 9261 8412 F: +61 8 9261 8486 M: TBA E-mail: jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx "Landin, Mark" <Mark.Landin@tdwi lliamson.com> To Sent by: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> thin-bounce@freel cc ists.org Subject [THIN] Re: Citrix farms over a WAN 23/05/2006 05:25 AM Please respond to thin That seems like one ... unorthodox? ... architecture to me. Care to clarify the details that are leading to this design? (Not saying it's wrong, just saying I can't think of the real-world problem this solution is looking for...) From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Lyne Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 4:02 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Citrix farms over a WAN Guys/Gals, I've been given a project to scope out a citrix farm design which consists of 27 sites with 2 load balanced Citrix servers on each site. The client needs it in this configuration for specific redundancy reasons (ie WAN redundancy etc...) Does any one know what the limitations on having a single farm span across 27 sites (limited bandwidth available as well). I was planning on specifying a zone for each site, and disabling load balancing across zones in MPS 4. Any other pointers would be much appreciated. Thanks, Tony Lyne Consultant Senior Systems Engineer (Embedded image moved to file: pic03806.gif) +64 6 353 7300 (Embedded image moved to file: pic29818.gif) +64 6 356 6800 +64 27 472 0696 tony.lyne@xxxxxxxxxxx www.gen-i.co.nz 172-174 Broadway Avenue, PO Box 1470, Palmerston North, New Zealand "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************