[THIN] Re: Citrix and VMWare

  • From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:17:32 -0700

Oh, really?  We see approx 10% utilization for dom0.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Matt Kosht
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:15 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix and VMWare

 

I think you will have better results splitting that RAM amongst more VM's.
If the object of your efforts is consolidation/user density on a physical
server this is a superior approach.  This is proven in http://projectvrc.com
<http://projectvrc.com/>  testing.

 

You don't need to dedicate a core to XS it uses so little CPU that it makes
no difference in my experience.  

-Matt

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Foster, Bill <Bill.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Thank you Matt for the response,

 

 

We actually are trying the PAE switch based on a discussion with Citrix
Consulting. They say this is a good general purpose setup for 9-12gb of ram,
after that you will run into kernel memory issues. We don't over commit
CPU's or memory so we are ok there. 

 

One question, you commit all  8 CPU's to VM's , You don't leave at least 1
for XenServer?

 

Bill Foster

Sr Systems Engineer, IT

Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.

8735 Henderson Road

Tampa, FL 33634

Ren1, First Floor

813-206-1158

Bill.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Matt Kosht
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:04 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix and VMWare

 

PAE actually makes term server run poorly with most application sets. I
would definitely recommend disabling it.
http://community.citrix.com/display/ocb/2008/08/04/PAE+This%21%21%21+Optimiz
ing+XenApp

 

 Best 32 bit/W2K3R2 setup I have found is 2vCPU/4GB RAM for each VM. Make
sure you don't overuse cores. there shouldn't be anymore vCPU's than cores
on your physical server. Memory shouldn't be overcommitted either (I reserve
2GB RAM for XenServer).  On a 24GB Dual Quad (not Nehalem) blade I
comfortably get (4) Citrix server VM's with the config above.

 

-Matt

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Foster, Bill <Bill.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

 

We are running PS 4.0 on XenServer 5.5 update2 using Provisioning server as
the deployment method(caching on local disk).

 

2 vCPU's

8 gb ram with PAE turned on.

 

Getting a 3-1 consolidation of this config. Our apps are memory starved and
not CPU.

 

 

Bill Foster

Sr Systems Engineer, IT

Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.

8735 Henderson Road

Tampa, FL 33634

Ren1, First Floor

813-206-1158

Bill.Foster@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:30 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Citrix and VMWare

 

 

Hi all, does anyone have any guidelines for Citrix VM servers on ESX 4.0? 
I currently have 5 Windows 2003 R2 PS 4.5 servers on ESX 4.0.  They are
assigned 1 virtual CPU and 2GB of Memory. 
They're all spiking up to 100%CPU for extended periods of time with about 15
users each.  Should I have 2 CPUs or 4?  
Any other advice would help. 

Thanks, 

_______________________________ 
Hector Minero 

Privacy Notice: This electronic mail message, and any attachments, are
confidential and are intended for 






the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is
proprietary and that may be 






Individually Identifiable or Protected Health Information under HIPAA. If
you are not the intended 






recipient, please immediately contact the sender by telephone, or by email,
and destroy all copies of this






message. If you are a regular recipient of our electronic mail, please
notify us promptly if you change 






your email address.

 

Privacy Notice: This electronic mail message, and any attachments, are
confidential and are intended for 


the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is
proprietary and that may be 


Individually Identifiable or Protected Health Information under HIPAA. If
you are not the intended 


recipient, please immediately contact the sender by telephone, or by email,
and destroy all copies of this


message. If you are a regular recipient of our electronic mail, please
notify us promptly if you change 


your email address.

 

Other related posts: