[THIN] Re: Citrix WAN design - the ultimate design

  • From: "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:24:33 -0500

i ran about 100 users per site off of 1.5 MPLS circuits and it was great.
If you are going to be running pure ICA traffic to thin clients, I wouldn't
worry about wanscaler but I would prioritize port 1494 on the links.




On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
> HI
>
> I have the fortunate situation where I have the opportunity to redesign our
> company WAN links / Citrix design.  Is there a best practice for numerous
> small branch offices (10 - 40 users)?  We have 30 sites around the country
> connected via frame relay links.  If you had the opportunity to design your
> farm from new how would you do it??.  Application use is fairly simple
> (Office, Outlook etc).  Im not looking for assistance on Citrix farm
> numbers, more high level..  This is what Im thinking:
>
> 4Mb WAN links from Head Office to all sites (direct, not via other
> branches)
> Centralised Print Server in Head Office
> Citrix Presentation Server 4.5
> Tricerat ScrewDrivers for Printing
>
>
> Would this be a good start?  Would anyone add Citrix WANScalers also or
> would 4Mb links be sufficient for sites with 40 users or less?
>
> Am I on the right track?
>
> Thanks
> Ang
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Messenger treats you to 30 free emoticons - Bees, cows, tigers
> and more!
>
> http://livelife.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=567534************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> Thinlist quick pick
> http://thinlist.net
> ************************************************
>

Other related posts: