i ran about 100 users per site off of 1.5 MPLS circuits and it was great. If you are going to be running pure ICA traffic to thin clients, I wouldn't worry about wanscaler but I would prioritize port 1494 on the links. On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > HI > > I have the fortunate situation where I have the opportunity to redesign our > company WAN links / Citrix design. Is there a best practice for numerous > small branch offices (10 - 40 users)? We have 30 sites around the country > connected via frame relay links. If you had the opportunity to design your > farm from new how would you do it??. Application use is fairly simple > (Office, Outlook etc). Im not looking for assistance on Citrix farm > numbers, more high level.. This is what Im thinking: > > 4Mb WAN links from Head Office to all sites (direct, not via other > branches) > Centralised Print Server in Head Office > Citrix Presentation Server 4.5 > Tricerat ScrewDrivers for Printing > > > Would this be a good start? Would anyone add Citrix WANScalers also or > would 4Mb links be sufficient for sites with 40 users or less? > > Am I on the right track? > > Thanks > Ang > _________________________________________________________________ > Windows Live Messenger treats you to 30 free emoticons - Bees, cows, tigers > and more! > > http://livelife.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=567534************************************************ > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter! > http://twitter.com/thinlist > Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at: > http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com > HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed! > http://thinlist.net/mobile > Thinlist quick pick > http://thinlist.net > ************************************************ >