[tcb] Re: Ronnie's engine

  • From: Bob Perring <perring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:59:53 -0600

Can't be more "check everything" than that !!
May never know what the culprit was.
Bob
============

At 07:38 3/28/2006, you wrote:
All tolerances were checked and within specs. The engine had about 500 miles on it. used a straight 30 weight oil for break-in. The engine temp never got over 190 degrees. when I built the engine it turned over freely without the plugs in so I don't think I missed the bearing pin when I assembled the crank. the end play was set with a dial indicater to proper specs. the only thing I can think of is a restriction in the oil galley going to the bearing. it has a very small hole for the oil to get thru and wouldn't take much to block it. I will have the block boiled out and all oil galleys checked again. --
Mark



Bob Perring <perring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: That would sure do it. It is amazing what a slight clearance difference will do to oil flow restriction when sleeve bearing tolerances are too tight. Bob ====================>


At 05:48 3/28/2006, you wrote: >I have seen it a couple of times. If the oil galley is plugged it >will run for just a couple of minutes before seizing. Sounds more >like the dowel pin hole is too shallow causing the pin to push on >the bearing slightly. > > >---------- >From: tcb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Mark Sawyer >Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:20 PM >To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [tcb] Ronnie's engine > >Found the problem. It's confusing the devil out of me. The #4 main >bearing next to the pulley had seized. This is one I have never seen >seize before. I was expecting the front main next to the flywheel. >The block is still standard so a .10 line bore is in order. The >crankshaft is standard as well so a .10 turn is in order for it as >well. Has any o ne ever seen this bearing go out???




Other related posts: