[sugpro] Re: Hello Sugpro

  • From: Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:57:24 -0500

You might be thinking of the quite instructive
http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/knpurify.html

I could see the appeal of using off the shelf stuff, though.

Glad to see sugpro activity.

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Michael Monteith
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrej,
>  I thought I had read somewhere that there is a way to separate out
> the anti-caking part.  Might of course be in one of my books that's packed
> for the moved and won't be here until like the first week of March.  Uggh
> But maybe someone here has surely been through that feat before.
>
> Michael
> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 2/10/15, Andrej Vrbec <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Subject: [sugpro] Re: Hello Sugpro
>  To: "sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 4:30 PM
>
>  Ah, OK
>  that makes it clearer. I thought that you have a 70cm BRB
>  GPS version.No, I
>  don't use any clamping. I know that clamping should
>  improve density but I haven't yet come to try this. I
>  typically get grains to about 97-97,5% of ideal density.
>  I did
>  quite some experimentation with different grades of
>  potassium nitrate. My goal was to develop a mixing and
>  casting technique that would allow me to use a fertilizer
>  grade potassium nitrate which is very cheap and readily
>  available. I've tried many different grades, particle
>  sizes, pH values, defoamers, surfactants, vacuum
>  degasing, you name it I've done it. In the end I just
>  couldn't get the same high density propellant as I get
>  when I use a food grade potassium nitrate without anticaking
>  agent. I've read that a lot of people use fertilizer
>  grade KN with good success but it wasn't working for me.
>  Surfactans and defoamers helped to some degree but still
>  the density was lower than with a food grade KN. It seems
>  that anticaking agents used in this potassium nitrate
>  fertilizers have a significant efect on wetting abilities of
>  molten dextrose. as they make the KN particle surface more
>  hydrofobic. All these problems went away when I switched
>  back to a potassium nitrate without anticaking agent, which
>  is twice the price of fertilizer grade, but gives very
>  good results. So far I
>  didn't have any problems with disbonding even in large
>  grains. The material I use for the inhibitor is not a
>  paper, but a gasket material called Tesnit BA-202, which is
>  made of organic fibers and nitrile rubber. I cut the
>  material to correct size to fit snugly in the steel tubular
>  holder which is then heated in an oven to 150°C as well as
>  base and a coring rod. Just before pouring, the mould is
>  pulled from the oven and the propellant is cast. Here is the
>  link to this material website: http://donit.eu/material/ba-202/ I
>  use 0,5mm thickness and the factory that makes it is
>  conveniently located just a few kilometers from my home
>  :)
>  Andrej
>
>    From: Richard Nakka
>  <richard.rocketry@xxxxxxxxx>
>   To:
>  sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Tuesday, February
>  10, 2015 8:55 PM
>   Subject: [sugpro] Re:
>  Hello Sugpro
>
>  Andrej,
>  Thanks for the info. I
>  actually bought the new BRB900 unit, which
>  comes with a simple GPS receiver. Great thing
>  about this unit is that
>  no amateur radio
>  licence is required.
>
>  To
>  keep this post on-topic, here's a question about your
>  propellant
>  grains (beauties, by the way). Do
>  you cure the KNDX under pressure  or
>  clamping? To prevent disbonding. I've
>  temporarily migrated to KNSB to
>  get good
>  bonding (I use clamping pressure), but would like to get
>  back
>  to using KNDX...to hopefully get those
>  nice flat thrust curves that
>  your motors
>  exhibit :-)
>
>  Richard
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Feb
>  10, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Andrej Vrbec
>  <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote:
>  > Hi Richard
>  >
>  > It's nice to hear
>  from you again. You are right, the propellant is plain
>  > KNDX. I've also experimented with
>  other sugars (sorbitol, erythritol and
>  >
>  mannitol) but in the end I decided in favor of dextrose.
>  > Bigredbee GPS was a real game changer at
>  least for me as I don't have large
>  >
>  open spaces to fly from. I fly from a small clearing in the
>  middle of the
>  > dense forest and so far I
>  haven't lost a rocket yet. BRB GPS is very easy to
>  > set up. First you must download a
>  configuration software from BRB website.
>  > When you connect the GPS to the computer
>  you can make settings like how
>  > often do
>  you want it to report location and altitude, your call sign,
>  output
>  > power, etc. On the ground you
>  will need some kind of radio setup that can
>  > decode incoming APRS data packets sent
>  from BRB GPS. There are a lot of
>  >
>  options but mostly it comes down to how much are you willing
>  to spend. Based
>  > on my experience I
>  would say that the best option for rocket use on the
>  > field would be an all-in-one radio such as
>  a Kenwood TH-D72 or a Yaesu
>  > VX-8GR
>  (recently discontinued) or Yaesu FT1DR. These radios are
>  pricey but
>  > very easy to carry around
>  when you are chasing you rocket as you don't have
>  > to have several pieces connected with
>  cables as would be the case with an
>  >
>  ordinary radio connected to a TNC (terminal node controler
>  such as Byonics
>  > TinyTrak4) and a
>  separate battery. When the radio receives the data packet
>  > from BRB GPS it decodes it and displays a
>  current altitude, latitude and
>  >
>  longitude. When the rocket lands you take the last known
>  coordinates and
>  > punch them into a
>  handheld GPS receiver or if you have one of the above
>  > mentioned radios it will display a
>  distance and direction to the landing
>  >
>  site.
>  >
>  > Andrej
>  > ________________________________
>  > From: Richard Nakka <richard.rocketry@xxxxxxxxx>
>  > To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 4:36
>  PM
>  > Subject: [sugpro] Re: Hello
>  Sugpro
>  >
>  > Amazing
>  work, Andrej...! Your rockets are beautifully crafted.
>  > Congratulations!
>  > I
>  particularly like your nice flat thrust curve, that's
>  KNDX, right?
>  >
>  > GPS
>  is a clearly a real boon to rocketry recovery, as your
>  flights
>  > demonstrate. I recently
>  purchased a big red bee GPS and look forward
>  > to flying it soon....although I must admit
>  I haven't quite figured out
>  > how to
>  use it ...
>  >
>  >
>  Richard
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Andrej Vrbec
>  > <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote:
>  >>
>  >>
>  Hello guys
>  >>
>  >>
>  I have just recently found out that Sugpro is active again.
>  I really
>  >> missed
>  >> it, as it was always fun to read what
>  others are doing with sugar
>  >>
>  propellants.
>  >> Recently I have
>  sucessfully flown a sugar rocket to 8km. Here are the
>  >> videos
>  >> of the
>  motor static test and the flight:
>  >>
>  >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2YJtmsqKSU
>  >>
>  >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4QmCuDgi_w
>  >>
>  >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zImHsYWY9-s
>  >>
>  >> Before that I
>  also made a sucessfull flights with a 100mm M motor. You
>  can
>  >> see the videos here:
>  >>
>  >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJlIXvbbtNA
>  >>
>  >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_AweYPlwkk
>  >>
>  >> How many
>  subscribers is there currently? I hope that most of the
>  folks
>  >> from
>  >>
>  the old Sugpro will join the new list.
>  >>
>  >> Best
>  regards
>  >> Andrej Vrbec
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: