[startgroup] Re: START

  • From: "Mike Doyle" <mj.doyle1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:11:25 +0100

Hi Quaz

Hope you are well and thanks for the info.

Mike
----- Original Message ----- From: "Quazi Haque (Dr)" <QuaziHaque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:49 PM
Subject: [startgroup] Re: START


Hi Mike and Tonia
Similar findings from us
- 45 minutes for the first evaluation and upto 30 mins for reviews.
Rgds
Kaz



-----Original Message-----
From: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue Jul 14 21:34:52 2009
Subject: [startgroup] Re: START

HI Mike,



Generally we find it requires an average of 30 mins in multidisciplinary tx team meetings. Details can be found in the attachment.



Best,

Tonia



Tonia L. Nicholls, Ph.D.

Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar



Senior Research Fellow
Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission

BC Mental Health & Addiction Services



Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia

Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University



ph: (604) 524-7790; fax: (604) 524-7905; email: tnicholls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tnicholls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Forensic Psychiatric Hospital

70 Colony Farm Road

Port Coquitlam

British Columbia, Canada

V3C 5X9



________________________________

From: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Doyle
Sent: July 14, 2009 1:30 PM
To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [startgroup] Re: START



Thanks Chris, Sarah and Steve for your helpful responses.



I think the items are ideal areas for consideration when assessing strengths and risks, but also for the assessment of physical, psychological, social and political needs. As you know we are piloting the START to do this as part of applying the health career model.



Initial feedback was good but the e-proforma we used (which included evidence boxes, formulation and intervention sections), was felt to take too long and many never fully completed it. In a sense we 'overcooked' the process as previous version was broadly welcomed! Therefore, attempting to make adjustments to make the process more efficient and practically useful. Will feedback to the group in due course.



Another query; on average how long do people find the START takes to complete?



Thanks again.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: christopher webster <mailto:christopherwebster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:52 PM

Subject: [startgroup] Re: START



Hi Mike,

Not sure I can add much. But, obviously, the HCR-20 provided a platform for us.And having a couple of senior, very experienced,nurses (Mary-Lou and Connie) made the essential difference. Somewhat later, as I explained in a paper given at the Montreal IAFMHS meeting on our joint behalf, I realized that a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms could have saved us some work. I really do,though, believe that the only way to set up an SPJ device that has any hope of working is to establish a small group of colleagues willing to work together assiduously until the task is done. It is not a task for a committee and it is not a task for an individual person. It should, of course, be a topic to be studied and researched in its own right.

Thanks, Roger, for getting this going! Cheers(We should be a formidable presence in Vcvr) Chris.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Doyle <mailto:mj.doyle1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:15 PM

Subject: [startgroup] START



Nice one Roger!



Looking forwarwd to networking with alll on the list.



First query; where did the 20 items of the START come from?



Thanks

Mike


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________


_________________________________________________________________

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Priory Central Services Limited (Registered No. 4391278)
Priory Healthcare Limited (Registered No. 6244860)
Priory Secure Services Limited (Registered No. 6244878)
Priory Education Services Limited (Registered No. 6244880)
Priory Rehabilitation Services Limited (Registered No. 6244877)

Each of the companies listed above is registered in England and its registered office is at Priory House, Randalls Way, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT22 7TP.
_________________________________________________________________



Other related posts: