I agree with Todd. I co-authored a DesignCon paper on this topic - but from a measurement and probing problem perspective. You might find something interesting in there. http://www.lecroy.com/files/WhitePapers/DesignCon_2010_WP.pdf Pete P.S. I apologize for my previous Blackberry problem a few weeks ago when I was reading Yuri's e-mail on the definition of voltage. If you recall, my intelligent response to his comments was "R". The lesson is to not read SI-LIST posts on family vacations at Hershey Park on your Blackberry. At least I got to find out everyone on the SI-LIST who was on vacation by the bounce-back messages! |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Todd Westerhoff" <twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |<si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |07/27/2011 11:35 AM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |[SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation? | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Sent by: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Cuong, The "glitch" you're seeing at the pin is characteristic of a series-terminated topology and is to be expected. Try breaking the transmission line into two pieces, probing in the middle, and see what happens. I covered some of the characteristic behaviors of source-terminated systems in this presentation: http://www.eda.org/ibis/summits/jun05/westerhoff.pdf I had a lot of fun creating that presentation, too. Todd. -- Todd Westerhoff VP, Software Products SiSoft 6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250 Maynard, MA 01754 (978) 461-0449 x24 twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx www.sisoft.com -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cuong Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:38 PM To: 'steve weir'; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation? Scope photo: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/34/tmp1n.jpg/ Circuit topology: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/tmp22n.jpg/ Measurements were made at the receiver end at the pin. Measurements at the die (not shown) do not show the glitch. Cuong -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of steve weir Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:13 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation? The SI-LIST server strips attachments. Post your pictures to something like imageshack and include a link. What is the topology from the driver to the receiver? Where are you measuring in your simulation? A double inflection such as a glitch implies L/C or Tx line reflection. That the series termination does not seem to affect the glitch much implies that the oscillation occurs between the driver and the transmission line. Excessive package inductance and/or capacitance for the driver's edge rate and strength could do such things to you. Steve. On 7/26/2011 3:48 PM, Cuong Nguyen wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Colleagues, > > > > I'm seeing a small "glitch" in a relatively simple simulation and > would like > to solicit your expert observations. > > Instead of showing 2 circuits and 2 scope traces I'm showing one set > only but will try to explain. > > > > 1. The original circuit does NOT have the series R1 resistor (17-ohm > suggested by the wizard) > > 2. The scope trace shows the result of the original circuit. > > > > My observations: > > > > 1. The "glitch" stays in both cases (with or without the series > termination) > > 2. With termination, the upper value of the voltage output is reduced > and the lower value > > is increased a little. The general shapes are the same in both cases. > However, because > > the "glitch" is shifted down (with termination) this now crosses the > threshold area and becomes > > problematic. > > > > The questions are: > > > > 1. What is this glitch? Is it from the package model? (If I choose > die I do not see the glitch) > > 2. What might be some ways to resolve this? (Or, is this some > simulation artifact?) > > > > Thanks for your inputs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === === === === === === > > Cuong Nguyen > > Field Application Engineer > > EDA Direct Inc > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu