[SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation?

  • From: Peter.Pupalaikis@xxxxxxxxxx
  • To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:45:38 -0400

I agree with Todd.  I co-authored a DesignCon paper on this topic - but
from a measurement and probing problem perspective.
You might find something interesting in there.

http://www.lecroy.com/files/WhitePapers/DesignCon_2010_WP.pdf

Pete

P.S. I apologize for my previous Blackberry problem a few weeks ago when I
was reading Yuri's e-mail on the definition of voltage.  If you recall, my
intelligent response to his comments was "R".  The lesson is to not read
SI-LIST posts on family vacations at Hershey Park on your Blackberry.  At
least I got to find out everyone on the SI-LIST who was on vacation by the
bounce-back messages!


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Todd Westerhoff" <twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx>                                      
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |<si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>                                                      
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |07/27/2011 11:35 AM                                                          
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |[SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation?                         
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Sent by:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx                                                 
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Cuong,

The "glitch" you're seeing at the pin is characteristic of a
series-terminated topology and is to be expected.

Try breaking the transmission line into two pieces, probing in the middle,
and see what happens.

I covered some of the characteristic behaviors of source-terminated
systems in this presentation:

http://www.eda.org/ibis/summits/jun05/westerhoff.pdf

I had a lot of fun creating that presentation, too.

Todd.

--

Todd Westerhoff
VP, Software Products
SiSoft
6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250
Maynard, MA 01754
(978) 461-0449 x24
twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx
www.sisoft.com


-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Cuong Nguyen
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:38 PM
To: 'steve weir'; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation?

Scope photo:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/34/tmp1n.jpg/

Circuit topology:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/tmp22n.jpg/

Measurements were made at the receiver end at the pin.  Measurements at
the die (not shown) do not show the glitch.

Cuong

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of steve weir
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:13 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation?

The SI-LIST server strips attachments.  Post your pictures to something
like imageshack and include a link.

What is the topology from the driver to the receiver?  Where are you
measuring in your simulation?

A double inflection such as a glitch implies L/C or Tx line reflection.
That the series termination does not seem to affect the glitch much
implies that the oscillation occurs between the driver and the
transmission line.  Excessive package inductance and/or capacitance for
the driver's edge rate and strength could do such things to you.



Steve.
On 7/26/2011 3:48 PM, Cuong Nguyen wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>            charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Colleagues,
>
>
>
> I'm seeing a small "glitch" in a relatively simple simulation and
> would
like
> to solicit your expert observations.
>
> Instead of showing 2 circuits and 2 scope traces I'm showing one set
> only but will try to explain.
>
>
>
> 1.       The original circuit does NOT have the series R1 resistor
(17-ohm
> suggested by the wizard)
>
> 2.       The scope trace shows the result of the original circuit.
>
>
>
> My observations:
>
>
>
> 1.       The "glitch" stays in both cases (with or without the series
> termination)
>
> 2.       With termination, the upper value of the voltage output is
reduced
> and the lower value
>
> is increased a little.  The general shapes are the same in both cases.
> However, because
>
> the "glitch" is shifted down (with termination) this now crosses the
> threshold area and becomes
>
> problematic.
>
>
>
> The questions are:
>
>
>
> 1.       What is this glitch?  Is it from the package model?  (If I
choose
> die I do not see the glitch)
>
> 2.       What might be some ways to resolve this?  (Or, is this some
> simulation artifact?)
>
>
>
> Thanks for your inputs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> === === === === === ===
>
> Cuong Nguyen
>
> Field Application Engineer
>
> EDA Direct Inc
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                  http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>                        //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                        http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>


--
Steve Weir
IPBLOX, LLC
150 N. Center St. #211
Reno, NV  89501
www.ipblox.com

(775) 299-4236 Business
(866) 675-4630 Toll-free
(707) 780-1951 Fax


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:
                         //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                         http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu



------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:
                         //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                         http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:
                         //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                         http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu





------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: