Cuong, The glitch is a reflection from the die. The IBIS model includes a pin model that the simulator represents with a transmission line. Therefore, the measurement point at the pin is between to transmission line segments. The impedance of the buffer at the die is most certainly not the same as the impedance of the transmission line representing the package. There are termination techniques that can remove the glitch, but each method has an associated cost. As others have stated, you probably don't need to worry about this small reflection. Weston -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nguyen, Cuong - EDA Direct Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:38 PM To: 'steve weir'; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation? Scope photo: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/34/tmp1n.jpg/ Circuit topology: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/tmp22n.jpg/ Measurements were made at the receiver end at the pin. Measurements at the die (not shown) do not show the glitch. Cuong -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of steve weir Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:13 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Mysterious "glitch" in the simulation? The SI-LIST server strips attachments. Post your pictures to something like imageshack and include a link. What is the topology from the driver to the receiver? Where are you measuring in your simulation? A double inflection such as a glitch implies L/C or Tx line reflection. That the series termination does not seem to affect the glitch much implies that the oscillation occurs between the driver and the transmission line. Excessive package inductance and/or capacitance for the driver's edge rate and strength could do such things to you. Steve. On 7/26/2011 3:48 PM, Cuong Nguyen wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Colleagues, > > > > I'm seeing a small "glitch" in a relatively simple simulation and > would like > to solicit your expert observations. > > Instead of showing 2 circuits and 2 scope traces I'm showing one set > only but will try to explain. > > > > 1. The original circuit does NOT have the series R1 resistor (17-ohm > suggested by the wizard) > > 2. The scope trace shows the result of the original circuit. > > > > My observations: > > > > 1. The "glitch" stays in both cases (with or without the series > termination) > > 2. With termination, the upper value of the voltage output is reduced > and the lower value > > is increased a little. The general shapes are the same in both cases. > However, because > > the "glitch" is shifted down (with termination) this now crosses the > threshold area and becomes > > problematic. > > > > The questions are: > > > > 1. What is this glitch? Is it from the package model? (If I choose > die I do not see the glitch) > > 2. What might be some ways to resolve this? (Or, is this some > simulation artifact?) > > > > Thanks for your inputs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === === === === === === > > Cuong Nguyen > > Field Application Engineer > > EDA Direct Inc > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu