>In CMOS technology, what's the difference between using MOS cap as VCC decoupling in three different ways? > >1. NMOS --> gate to VCC, other three nodes to VSS (inversion) This is OK. Can't isolate the ground supply from the substrate in a normal commercial Nwell process. >2. PMOS --> gate to VCC, other three nodes to VSS (accumulation) This is not a good capacitor. It has a high series resistance from the Well connection (vss) to the gate oxide. >3. PMOS --> gate to vss, other three nodes to VCC ( inversion) This is the best capacitor for an NWELL process. The well provides isolation from the substrate supply. The resistance can be low providing the gate length is less than a couple of microns. We prefer this capacitor in applications where we need to decouple isolated power supplies. Such applications include PLL, gigabit links, etc. -------------------------------------------------------------- | Bill Cohen | Toshiba America Electronic Components | Mixed Signal Design Group -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu