[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Futurity Requirements Redux

  • From: Pinehillgsds@xxxxxxx
  • To: joank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, TISHW@xxxxxxx, rivendellp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:28:33 EDT

 
 
In a message dated 9/27/2005 10:22:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
joank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I
just don't get why we can't adjust the number of litters required  each year.
Combining regions is NOT the  answer.

JMHO

Joannie



But doesn't it diminish the idea of "getting wood" when you beat one  dog or 
no dogs and still "take home wood" from a class.  Whatever the  reasons are 
for low entries, and they've been beat to death previously so I'm  not going 
into them, why not contract the regions per the entry #s and make  "getting 
wood" 
in a class mean something again?  It seems to me we're on a  downward 
spiral...
 
Kathy
three generations of Dual Titled Champions  live here!

visit _Pine Hill German Shepherd  Dogs_ 
(http://www.geocities.com/pinehillgsds/)  


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: