[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Florida Legislative Alert
- From: Wasatchgld@xxxxxxx
- To: Vixen12@xxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 18:57:31 EST
In a message dated 3/9/2006 12:14:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
Vixen12@xxxxxxx writes:
I don't see the problem...don't we keep records on our puppies worming, and
shots prior to taking in for their health certs? I do! I also have a
contract that allows buyers 72 hours to take said puppy to a vet for
exam....I
don't know if I'm missing something here??
Tina
My contracts provide for most of these requirements, also. But I do have
a concern with the provision that says the seller must reimburse any vet
costs
the buyer incurred. There's no telling what kind of charges you may get if
the buyer knows they don't have to pay for anything. The less responsible
vets may urge the puppy buyers to run unnecessary, expensive tests, too.
My contract states that I am not liable for any expenses other than what I
agree to in writing before hand. `
There is also the question on whether the state will accept the records of
worming and vaccinations that were not administered by a vet.
Janice
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================
Other related posts:
