I've lost track of that one, Dave (gee...wonder why), but I think it's still working its way through. LOTS of opposition, as you can imagine. Stormy In a message dated 7/11/07 7:46:27 AM, d_fritsche@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > I think I'll propose that we do what Ark. was going to do (or did they?). > > "No political jurisdicition in this state shall make any law regulating > the breeding of animals used in agricultural enterprise, in the pursuit of > sport or recreation or regulate the number thereof." > > "Political subdivisions within this state may regulate the level of care > animals are to receive, tend to the matters of animal abuse, neglect and > supervision, but shall not regulate the private property rights of animal > ownership, or any legitimate or historic role of animals in relationship > to that ownership." > > Or something like that! > A good healthy backlash is in order. > ~~~~~~~~ Stormy Hope California Federation of Dog Clubs www.cfodconline.org S.P. Region GSDCA RALEEF Representative ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org ============================================================================