Re: rump{bake,run} configuration files (Re: Make rumpbake more flexible)

  • From: Justin Cormack <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:34:50 +0100

On 30 Sep 2015 11:21 am, "Antti Kantee" <pooka@xxxxxx> wrote:


On 30/09/15 09:42, Justin Cormack wrote:

Or you could have a rumplinkconfig tool that just output the linker args.


I have trouble imagining how it would be convenient for the users. Can
you produce a working mockup of the build process with such a tool? (i.e.
no need to write the tool, just hardcode the output)


rumpbake myfile $(rumplinkconfig qemu exterminate ext2)

More unixy, can run standalone to work out what's going on under the
hood.


With that premise seems like cc is "less unixy".

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rumpkernel-users
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2015