[romefloydhumanesocietychairs] Re: micro-chipping - FYI
- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "asusieburns@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: "romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 16:10:23 -0400
To begin with if AC got the adoption. Money instead of it going back to county
there could more done
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Richard Landry <fivestar1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> gotta wonder where the money goes..... not only what $ AC gets, but what it
> doesn't get that it's supposed to.... The Director is a "yes man" to the
> asst county manager and thus the commissioners. They all are terrified of
> loosing their positions if they raise taxes, so the animals suffer. The
> animal welfare board does zero, zilch, nada....
>
> I need to get back to the law books to determine exactly what the county is
> obligated to provide for the animals it takes in. It is after all, a shelter
> that is licensed by Dept of Ag. and subject to their requirements and minumum
> standards. I know JB makes it his call on most things but he oversteps his
> authority in some decisions.
>
> He has a rule that there must be 12 empty cages at all times. Huh? Most
> good shelters have just the opposite rule, there being no euthanisia of a
> healthy animal if even one empty cage exists. He has a rule stating no
> cameras allowed, he has a rule that a person cannot "bad-mouth" AC practices
> or personnel while on the premises. He has in the past ignored ambient
> temperature requirements and probably still does. The inmates feed, water
> the animals and clean the place, but who gives the animals water on Sundays,
> especially through the summer??
>
> Bottom line is this... AC gets credit for a low euthanasia rate, but in
> truth, it's a small number of rescuers, maybe three or four people, who do
> almost all the pulling, and if they were to get sick, move away or quit, the
> euthanasia rate would skyrocket.
>
> A lot of issues need to be addressed before the county spends 5+ million $$$
> on a new facility.
>
> Dick
>
> Email messages authored and distributed by the sender are intended as private
> communications.
>
> Do not Forward or CC or Bcc without the writers consent.
>
> Lonestar Coastal 727-804-4235 Pilgrim Self Storage 770-749-1104 Living
> and Giving 706-235-5530 Rome/Floyd Humane Society
>
>
>
> Of this there can be no doubt: when you save a single animal, or do something
> to improve the conditions in which it lives, you have changed the world.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Redacted sender BWTerry2575@xxxxxxx for
>> DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is this something that should be done?; wWe would have to list reasons why.
>> If so, how can we facilitate it being instituted? benny delete key
>> not working
>>
>> In a message dated 5/9/2014 12:01:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> jeanie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>> There was discussion at the meeting last night re: micro-chipping. Someone
>> stated that FCAC micro-chips adopted pets (for an add’l fee) when adopted
>> through them. I called today and that is NOT true. They have not done this
>> in over 5 years. Yet another thing that was eliminated due to “budget”,
>> Vickie said.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeanie
>>
>
Other related posts:
